Generate New Research Ideas with SciSpace's Agentic AI


Agentic AI finds new research ideas

Dear Scholar,

A new type of AI has been released this week: AI Agents. Instead of answering a query in one step, like a generative AI, an agent has a goal, and it will plan, search, and review results to achieve it (see diagram below). This involves many iterations and can easily take 15 minutes.

The SciSpace AI agent does this for academics and searches academic papers, rather than the internet, as the ChatGPT agent does.

You can imagine that this opens far more complex use cases for academics, bordering on systematic literature reviews. I used it to generate new research ideas in this week's tutorial:

Having worked with a large dataset for years, I aim to continue leveraging it to publish new papers. In this tutorial, I described my dataset in detail and asked the SciSpace AI Agent to find research questions that could be answered using this dataset. In about 15 minutes, it suggested 10 papers I could write, including methodology and a target journal. This article also briefly compares it with ChatGPT's agent, which was released recently as well.

Discounts for SciSpace

If you want to test SciSpace's agentic AI, feel free to use any of these discount codes:

20% monthly discount: ILDR20

40% yearly discount: ILDR40

40% add-on credit discount: ILYASA40

Wishing you a wonderful weekend,


Ilya Shabanov, The Effortless Academic

P.S.: Learn more about how AI can speed up your literature review in my most popular course: Effortless AI Literature Review.

Don't want to receive emails like this: Unsubscribe from newsletter only .
Want to unsubscribe from all future emails?
Unsubscribe from everything.
Your
Preferences.

The Effortless Academic

Literature Review Tools, Note-Taking Strategies and AI tutorials for the modern academic. Publish more with less effort and supercharge your career.

Read more from The Effortless Academic

AI Literature Review Workflow in 2025 Dear Scholar, When I published my literature review workflow diagram, it garnered positive and negative reactions. Surprisingly, a lot of academics reject the idea that AI should be used in literature reviews because we as scientists will not be able to maintain our creativity or learn much. Here are some reactions: All of these criticisms come from senior academics with years of experience. For instance, the professor on the top left rejects AI-written...

Academic Writing Apps Comparison Dear Scholar, In this week’s article, I want to compare three tools for academic writing: PaperPal, which is made for academics, ChatGPT, a general-purpose tool and Grammarly, which is optimised for grammar. It turns out there is no best tool out there. The question is, rather, when should you use which tool? This article suggests using ChatGPT in the brainstorming and ideation phase of your writing due to its general purpose and customizability. Then move on...

The AI-readiness checklist Dear Scholar, Everybody has heard about AI, but very few have mastered the art of using it effectively. I decided to design a small test that will help you determine how good you are at using AI as an academic. Answer these 10 yes/no questions to find out your AI readiness score. The article also features in-depth explanations and links in case you couldn't answer something and would like to know more about the topic. Read this week's blogpost & take the test Free...