profile

The Effortless Academic

The missing rules for ethical AI use in academic writing

Published 4 days ago • 1 min read

Dear Reader,

Last week, I made a post on using AI for academic writing, which enraged the community like nothing I have ever written.

4 Million views & about 400 hate comments.

A dozen people even took the time to reach out to the dean of my university & my supervisors (yet none to me personally).

I don't think even 1% read past the hook ("I wrote 4000 words for my thesis with AI") and ignored that the basis for the entire process were my own papers, the workflow included deep-reading & note-taking as a key component and that the result consisted predominantly of sorted bullet points to find relevant papers.

This alerted me to a much bigger problem: "Using AI means something different to everyone". That is why the question about it is so inflammatory - we are talking apples and oranges.

This week, I made a video explaining exactly what I mean by using AI and which parts of it are ethical, based on definitions I found.

The main idea I developed is that we first need to break down AI use into categories: (1)Generate Ideas, (2) build understanding, (3) write a paper, and (4) polish writing. Each permits a different level of AI, and each has implications for your academic career. But ultimately in the long run, AI is a levelling technology that has the potential to make hard intellectual labour obsolete, just like electricity or the combustion engine replaced the need for hard manual labour.

(It's one of my first YouTube videos, I'd appreciate it if you subscribed & liked it, if you find it useful.)

​

Wishing you a wonderful weekend,

​
Ilya Shabanov, The Effortless Academic​

This is the weekly Effortless Academic Newsletter. It consists of an in-depth tutorial and additional events, promotions, or relevant information for the AI-curious modern academic. I strive to consistently provide value with every email. If this is not relevant to you, you can always unsubscribe from everything and will never hear from me again. If you find the email somehow inappropriate, please reply to me and let me know what you didn't like.

The Effortless Academic

Literature Review Tools, Note-Taking Strategies and AI tutorials for the modern academic. Publish more with less effort and supercharge your career.

Read more from The Effortless Academic

Obsidian Bases for Idea Generation Dear Reader, Generating new ideas is the currency in academia: The more impactful your ideas, the more impactful your research, and the better your chances of success. But what are ideas? Ideas are connections between two related concepts. For instance, if someone finds a link between a vegetarian diet and hip fracture rates, that's novel and vital research that could improve people's lives. But these two concepts are not necessarily related. Nutritionists...

25 days ago • 1 min read

Sourcely.net (Sponsor) Your AI-powered academic search assistant, offering access to over 200 million papers. Sourcely finds papers matching an entire manuscript rather than a short query, providing scientific evidence for every sentence and enabling the so-called "reverse literature review": Write first, cite later. Discount Codes:Effortless40 (40% off annual)or Effortless20 (20% off monthly) Which Reference Manager To Choose For AI Dear Scholar, Reference Managers are the workhorses of...

about 1 month ago • 1 min read

Reverse Literature Review with Sourcely Dear Scholar, A literature review usually starts with finding relevant papers and reading them to write your manuscript. However, sometimes the reverse can be more powerful: Write up ideas first before searching for relevant literature. This week's newsletter shows you how to do this with sourcely and its freshly released deep search capabilities. But why, you might ask? In my own research, I have come up with a few examples when this workflow is handy:...

about 2 months ago • 2 min read