Literature Review Tools, Note-Taking Strategies and AI tutorials for the modern academic. Publish more with less effort and supercharge your career.
Share
10 Mistakes to avoid in Academic Writing
Published about 5 hours ago • 2 min read
Tool Review: Consensus 2026 for Lit Reviews & Writing Phase
Dear Reader,
Academics who use AI for academic writing typically fall into two camps: Those who try to do too much at once, generating whole paragraphs, and those who only occasionally ask for small corrections.
One is ethically questionable and produces poor-quality output, while the other leaves a lot of potential on the table. Both require a lot of manual editing and don't make you all that much more productive.
Having tried both ends of the spectrum, I realised that the problem was me, not AI.
The solution I found for using AI productively is preparation.
If you provide what to write in a specific format, AI can save days of time when writing academic work. I call it the atomic sentence method, and if you have already signed up for the upcoming academic writing webinar, you will learn all about it shortly.
This week, I wrote down all the mistakes I made during the writing phase of my PhD and the last 4 papers. I hope you can avoid making the same ones.
Summary: The mistakes described in this article are: Missing or meaningless context, using AI for parts of the paper which are not suitable for AI, wrong prompts, wrong expectations, a lack of persistence to get good output, and a lack of precision. I also outline how to fix each of these mistakes.
If you have high standards for academic writing, using AI is very challenging. The devil is in the detail, and the first bout of euphoria quickly fades when you realise that the output often lacks depth, finesse and individuality.
After 3+ years of experiment I found ways to solve it.
And the techniques presented in this webinar made me 2-3x more productive, even allowing me to complete my PhD requirements ahead of schedule.
Don't miss the webinar (or recording if you can't make it).
For a year or so, I have been optimising a suite of AI-assistants for various tasks, which I will share with webinar participants.
My favourite of these AI assistants extracts ideas from papers into a format you can use to write your literature review:
The trick is that you don't take notes in just any format, but a specific one (the atomic sentences mentioned earlier) that is optimised for easier academic writing.
The previous webinar in 2025 was quite a success, and I hope some of you who joined previously put the ideas to good use. Here are some voices from last year:
Here is what we'll cover:
The "Atomic Statement Method" to control what AI writes
Building AI assistants specifically for academic writing
Teaching an AI to write in your voice instead of a generic tone
Fact-checking your writing with AI
Skim papers with AI to deepen specific arguments
Improve clarity and flow of manuscript drafts
Understand which parts of the paper are suitable for AI writing
An iterative writing improvement workflow which avoids plagiarism
Understand when not to use AI for writing
Ethical considerations of AI writing (journals and universities)
Check the link below for more information & the date of the Webinar:
This is the weekly Effortless Academic Newsletter. It consists of an in-depth tutorial and additional events, promotions, or relevant information for the AI-curious modern academic. I strive to consistently provide value with every email. If this is not relevant to you, you can always unsubscribe from everything and will never hear from me again. If you find the email somehow inappropriate, please reply to me and let me know what you didn't like.
The Effortless Academic
Literature Review Tools, Note-Taking Strategies and AI tutorials for the modern academic. Publish more with less effort and supercharge your career.
Tool Review: Consensus 2026 for Lit Reviews & Writing Phase Dear Reader, I am wrapping up writing my PhD thesis and am currently 3 months ahead of schedule, with two papers accepted and two more in review. This feels good, especially as I will be able to dedicate much more time to the EffortlessAcademic. I think most students could do this if they master what almost nobody does: The combination of digital notes + AI. Here is why: A digital note-taking system, helps learning and remembering...
New Effortless Writing with AI WebinarApril 11, 2026 (+ Recording) Dear Reader, It seems easy to "write with AI", but fairly quickly, you realise 99% of AI-written text doesn't actually meet academic standards. Typically, the text is vague, overly verbose, or just plain wrong. Maybe you've been there? I've had this experience as well, which prompted me to push AI to its limits, to build a system that is ethical, personal, fact-checked, and produces writing tailored to academic needs. My main...
Notion vs Obsidian for Academics Dear Reader, Notion and Obsidian are two very popular note-taking tools used by thousands of researchers, students, and academics worldwide. If you are a long-time reader of the EffortlessAcademic, you probably know my preference for Obsidian, but this has practical reasons. Notion has a few strengths that Obsidian can't match, and for your use case, it might even be better suited. Sharing notes, for example, or AI and calendar integration are superb in...